Perkin Warbeck and Lambert Simnel: Royal Pretenders or Lost Princes?
Reading Time: 14 minutes Two boys from modest beginnings nearly rewrote the story of England’s monarchy. In the decades following the Wars of the Roses, Perkin Warbeck and Lambert Simnel emerged as serious threats to the fragile Tudor hold on power. Each claimed to be a missing royal heir—Simnel as Edward Plantagenet, Earl of Warwick, and Warbeck as Richard of Shrewsbury. Their stories gained traction not just from their words but from the powerful allies who believed—or pretended to believe—them.
Were these boys cunning impostors used as pawns in larger political games, or could they have been the rightful heirs to the English throne? Their rise during Henry VII’s reign raises deeper questions about royal identity, loyalty, and the desperation that followed a kingdom torn by civil war. In exploring their claims, we uncover not only the mysteries of lost princes but also the foundations on which the Tudor dynasty was built.
The Princes in the Tower
The mystery of the Princes in the Tower remains one of the most enduring enigmas in English history. Edward V and his younger brother, Richard of Shrewsbury, were the sons of King Edward IV and Elizabeth Woodville. When Edward IV died unexpectedly in April 1483, his 12-year-old son Edward was set to inherit the throne. As was custom, Edward V was sent to the Tower of London to await his coronation, joined shortly afterward by his brother Richard. They were never seen in public again.
Their uncle, Richard, Duke of Gloucester, was appointed Lord Protector but quickly moved to secure the crown for himself. Citing questions over the legitimacy of Edward IV’s marriage, Richard declared the princes illegitimate and had himself crowned as Richard III. Though this gave him legal standing, the fate of the boys raised suspicion. Their sudden disappearance cast a dark shadow over Richard’s reign and damaged his reputation almost immediately.
Contemporaries and later chroniclers accused Richard III of ordering the boys’ murder to eliminate rivals. Sir Thomas More, writing decades later, claimed the deed was carried out under Richard’s orders, a view popularized by Shakespeare. However, other suspects have been proposed, including the Duke of Buckingham and even Henry VII. The absence of physical evidence and the secrecy surrounding the case have only deepened the mystery.
Rumors about the princes’ fate spread quickly across England and Europe. Some claimed the boys had escaped, while others insisted they had been killed and buried in secret. The discovery of two small skeletons in the Tower during the 17th century added a haunting clue, but no firm conclusion was ever reached. Without confirmation, the mystery left space for opportunists and supporters of the Yorkist cause to imagine the boys might still be alive.
This atmosphere of doubt and sorrow created a vacuum, one filled by powerful stories and political ambition. For a population weary of civil war and uncertain succession, the idea that one of the princes had survived offered both hope and an opportunity to challenge the Tudor regime. Pretenders like Perkin Warbeck would later use that uncertainty to their advantage, stepping into the role of lost royalty.
The disappearance of Edward V and Richard of Shrewsbury became more than a tragedy—it became a tool. Their story lived on through whispered rumors, loyalist dreams, and the strategic calculations of rival factions. Whether dead or missing, the Princes in the Tower remained a symbol of what had been lost—and what might still be claimed.
Richard III and the Fall of the House of York
Richard III’s rise to power in 1483 marked the final chapter of the Yorkist dynasty. Following the declaration of the illegitimacy of the Princes in the Tower, he was crowned king in July 1483. Though legal on paper, his actions deeply unsettled the realm and fractured Yorkist loyalty.
Richard’s reign lasted just over two years, marked by tension, rebellion, and mistrust. His unpopularity grew amid suspicions over the fate of his nephews and increasing discontent among former supporters of Edward IV. In 1483, a failed rebellion known as Buckingham’s Rebellion showed the cracks forming in Richard’s base. Though he managed to suppress unrest, the seeds of opposition were firmly planted.
In 1485, Henry Tudor, a Lancastrian claimant living in exile, landed in Wales with a modest army. Gathering support as he marched inland, Henry confronted Richard at the Battle of Bosworth Field. On August 22, 1485, Richard was killed in the fighting, famously choosing to fight rather than flee. With his death, the House of York collapsed, and Henry Tudor was crowned King Henry VII, launching the Tudor dynasty.
Henry VII’s claim to the throne was tenuous at best. His lineage came through a female line, and from a branch considered illegitimate by many. To strengthen his position, he married Elizabeth of York, uniting the feuding houses of Lancaster and York. Their union was meant to heal the wounds of the Wars of the Roses and give legitimacy to Henry’s new rule. Yet the kingdom remained divided and uncertain.
Yorkist supporters, still loyal to the memory of Edward IV and his bloodline, viewed Henry with suspicion. Many questioned the fate of the true heirs and were eager to rally behind anyone who appeared to have a stronger claim. This unrest created fertile ground for rebellion—and for figures like Lambert Simnel and Perkin Warbeck to emerge. Each would test the strength of Henry’s hold on the crown in the years that followed.
The fall of Richard III and the rise of the Tudors did not bring peace, but rather a fragile stability. Henry VII ruled with caution and suspicion, aware that his throne rested on a claim many considered weaker than the ones still whispered about in taverns and courts. In this climate of uncertainty, the past refused to stay buried, and rumors of lost princes would soon return to haunt the new king.
Lambert Simnel and the Yorkist Rebellion of 1487
Lambert Simnel was a young boy, likely around ten years old, when he became the figurehead of one of the first major threats to Henry VII’s reign. Born to a humble family in Oxford, Simnel was trained by a priest named Richard Symonds, who noted his resemblance to royal blood. Symonds initially planned to pass Simnel off as Richard of Shrewsbury, but changed course when he heard that Edward Plantagenet, Earl of Warwick, was imprisoned in the Tower of London. Claiming that Simnel was the real Warwick and the one in the Tower was a fraud, they launched a bold attempt to place him on the throne.
The Yorkist cause found powerful support in John de la Pole, Earl of Lincoln, a nephew of Edward IV and a former heir under Richard III. Lincoln had served in Henry VII’s court but defected, fleeing to Burgundy where he gathered support from Margaret of York, the dowager duchess and sister to Edward IV. She provided funding and foreign troops, helping to build an invasion force centered around the false “Edward of Warwick.”
In a dramatic show of confidence, Simnel was crowned “King Edward VI” in Dublin in May 1487. Ireland, a Yorkist stronghold, offered little resistance to the claim. The coronation, though symbolic, was intended to legitimize Simnel’s identity and inspire loyalty among English nobles. The invasion force soon crossed into England, hoping to rally further support as they moved inland. However, many English nobles hesitated, wary of backing another failed cause.
On June 16, 1487, Henry VII’s forces met the rebel army at the Battle of Stoke Field near Newark. Though the Yorkists fought hard, the combination of foreign mercenaries and limited English support proved their undoing. John de la Pole was killed in battle, along with many leading Yorkist commanders. The defeat at Stoke Field is often considered the final engagement of the Wars of the Roses, marking the collapse of significant Yorkist resistance.
Remarkably, Henry VII showed unexpected mercy toward Simnel. Understanding the boy had been a puppet in the hands of ambitious adults, Henry pardoned him. Simnel was given work in the royal kitchens and later became a royal falconer, spending the rest of his life in relative obscurity. Henry’s decision to spare Simnel served both as a gesture of strength and a subtle form of humiliation for the rebellion’s supporters.
The Simnel affair exposed the vulnerability of Henry VII’s early reign. Even a child could be molded into a figurehead and used to challenge royal authority. It also set the stage for future impostors like Perkin Warbeck, who would raise far more serious questions about the survival of the lost princes and the limits of Tudor legitimacy.
Perkin Warbeck and the Long Deception
In the early 1490s, a young man named Perkin Warbeck emerged on the European stage, claiming to be Richard of Shrewsbury, the younger of the two Princes in the Tower. According to Warbeck, he had escaped the Tower’s walls and had been living in secrecy for years. His story quickly gained attention, not just because of the mystery surrounding the princes, but because it threatened the legitimacy of Henry VII. Whether he was an impostor or a long-lost prince, Warbeck’s presence reignited Yorkist hopes.
Warbeck’s claim found influential supporters abroad. Margaret of Burgundy, sister to Edward IV and Richard III, publicly recognized him as her nephew and offered financial and political support. Her backing gave Warbeck credibility among continental courts. He also gained the favor of James IV of Scotland, who arranged a marriage between Warbeck and a Scottish noblewoman. These alliances gave Warbeck resources and protection, making him more than just a rumor—he became a real danger to the Tudor crown.
Between 1495 and 1497, Warbeck made multiple attempts to invade England. His first effort to land in Kent failed, and he was driven back by local forces. He later tried to capitalize on unrest in Ireland and Cornwall, but his efforts lacked broad support. Each time, Henry VII responded swiftly, offering pardons to Warbeck’s followers while reinforcing his claim through diplomacy and propaganda. Despite setbacks, Warbeck continued to rally support and remained a lingering threat for nearly a decade.
Eventually, Warbeck was captured in 1497 after a failed uprising in Cornwall. Henry VII initially spared his life, holding him at court under supervision. However, Warbeck allegedly attempted to escape and may have plotted with Edward, Earl of Warwick, the real Plantagenet imprisoned in the Tower. This final act sealed his fate. In 1499, both Warbeck and Warwick were executed, removing two of the last major threats to Henry’s rule.
Warbeck’s confession, in which he admitted to being the son of a Tournai customs official, was widely circulated by the Tudor regime. But many historians question its authenticity. Given Henry’s need to quash Yorkist claims, the confession may have been coerced or crafted for political effect. Warbeck had convinced royals, nobles, and foreign courts of his royal identity—something difficult to achieve without a convincing story and bearing.
Whether Warbeck was a skilled impostor or an actual prince lost to history, his campaign showed how fragile Tudor authority remained in its early years. His ability to gain international backing and stir unrest within England demonstrated that the mystery of the Princes in the Tower had not faded—and that in a land still healing from civil war, the past could be as dangerous as any army.
Royal Pretenders or Lost Princes?
The question of whether Perkin Warbeck and Lambert Simnel were mere pretenders or rightful claimants has long divided historians. In Simnel’s case, the true Edward, Earl of Warwick, was alive and imprisoned in the Tower of London, which makes Simnel’s identity as an impostor easier to verify. Yet at the time, many believed in his claim, primarily as it was supported by powerful nobles like John de la Pole. The fact that Simnel was crowned in Dublin and fought a full-scale battle suggests that his backers were either convinced or willing to use him as a political tool.
Perkin Warbeck’s case is more mysterious. His ability to gain recognition from European courts, including Margaret of Burgundy and James IV of Scotland, lent weight to his claim. Margaret claimed to recognize him as her nephew and the lost Duke of York, which influenced others to support his cause. While the Tudor government labeled him a fraud, the sophistication of his story and demeanor caused many to wonder if he might truly be one of the missing princes, returned to reclaim his birthright.
Tudor propaganda played a critical role in discrediting both boys. Henry VII distributed printed confessions, emphasized their humble origins, and depicted them as pawns of foreign powers. These narratives were designed not only to undermine their claims but to protect the fragile legitimacy of the new Tudor dynasty. In a time when printing was becoming more common, the ability to control public opinion through official accounts was a powerful tool.
Even so, the fate of the Princes in the Tower—Edward V and Richard of Shrewsbury—was never officially resolved. Their disappearance in 1483 left a vacuum that fueled speculation for decades. Without confirmed deaths, the idea that one or both had survived remained plausible to many. Warbeck’s claim that he was Richard found fertile ground in this atmosphere of doubt and secrecy.
Some contemporaries may have believed these boys were who they claimed to be simply because they wanted to believe it. Yorkist loyalists needed a symbol to rally around, and the idea of a surviving prince was compelling. Others may have known the truth but chose to support the cause as a means to destabilize Tudor rule. Either way, the distinction between belief and political convenience was often blurred.
The enduring mystery of the Princes in the Tower gives the stories of Simnel and Warbeck their lasting intrigue. Whether they were manipulated figureheads or lost royals seeking justice, they represent a period of English history when identity, power, and truth were all contested on a dangerous stage. Their rise—and ultimate fall—reminds us how uncertain the line between fact and fiction can be when history is written in the shadow of ambition.
![Perkin Warbeck; or, the Last of the Plantagenets. [a Novel.] By t...](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/41E5FrJxzfL._SY445_SX342_.jpg)
Historical Significance
The rise of Lambert Simnel and Perkin Warbeck revealed just how vulnerable the Tudor regime was in its early years. Henry VII had claimed the throne through battle, not clear hereditary right, and the appearance of alternative claimants exposed the uncertainty surrounding his legitimacy. Both Simnel and Warbeck drew significant support from factions still loyal to the House of York, suggesting that many nobles were not fully committed to the new dynasty. Their very existence challenged the idea that Henry’s victory at Bosworth had ended the Wars of the Roses.
Domestically, the threats forced Henry VII to strengthen royal control. After Simnel’s rebellion, he restructured the nobility, increased surveillance, and tightened laws around treason. Warbeck’s long campaign spurred further reforms, especially in coastal defense and intelligence networks. Abroad, these pretenders affected diplomatic relations. Foreign rulers used Warbeck as a bargaining chip in negotiations with England. The fact that James IV of Scotland supported Warbeck shows how seriously rival powers viewed the Tudor crown’s fragility.
Henry’s response to both threats included not just military force but calculated propaganda. He painted Simnel and Warbeck as puppets, manipulated by self-serving rebels and hostile powers. By publishing confessions, displaying captured rebels, and carefully managing public perception, Henry worked to delegitimize both claimants and elevate his image as the true, divinely favored king. These tactics helped establish the Tudor reputation for strong, centralized rule—but they were built on a foundation of fear and uncertainty.
The stories of Simnel and Warbeck also reveal how myth and memory could be weaponized. The mystery of the Princes in the Tower left a space where fiction and hope could take root. Simnel’s coronation and Warbeck’s courtly demeanor were not just acts of rebellion; they were performances meant to invoke Yorkist nostalgia and challenge the Tudor narrative. In a world where bloodline and lineage shaped politics, identity could be as powerful as an army.
Today, Simnel and Warbeck remain vivid figures in the story of England’s dynastic struggles. Though their campaigns failed, they influenced how history remembers the early Tudor period—not as an age of peace, but as a time of fragile power and political uncertainty. Their tales appear in plays, novels, and scholarly debates, enduring symbols of ambition, mystery, and the dangerous pull of a lost crown.
Their legacies serve as reminders that history is often shaped not only by kings and battles, but by the stories people choose to believe. In a kingdom recovering from civil war, the right claim told at the right time could still shake a throne. That truth haunted Henry VII’s rule and shaped the foundation of Tudor power for generations to come.
Conclusion
Perkin Warbeck and Lambert Simnel were unlikely figures—one a baker’s son, the other a customs clerk’s apprentice—yet both managed to stir a kingdom still recovering from civil war. Their stories, woven with mystery, ambition, and political manipulation, shook the foundations of Henry VII’s fragile rule. Whether they truly believed their own claims or were tools in the hands of greater powers, their impact was undeniable. They exposed the cracks in a dynasty still finding its footing and reminded the world how quickly doubt could take hold in the absence of truth.
Were they royal pretenders or lost princes returned from the shadows? The answer may never be fully known. But their rise teaches a lasting lesson: in times of uncertainty, people will cling to even the faintest hope of rightful leadership. A convincing tale, told well, can carry armies and bend history. And in a land haunted by missing heirs and fractured loyalties, the shadow of a crown was often powerful enough to rival the real thing.
